Thursday, January 31, 2019

Psychological Analysis of Lee Harvey Oswald Essay -- Psychological Cap

On November 22nd, 1963 prexy John F. Kennedy was assassinated. It was concluded by The rabbit warren Commission that the man who assassinated President Kennedy was 24 year old, lee side Harvey Oswald. Less than 48 hours after Kennedy was shot, while Oswald was being transferred to the county jail, he was assassinated. lee side Harvey Oswald was killed before he could downstairsgo every psychological or psychiatrical analysis, so it is impossible to know for certain what his mental state was at the time of President Kennedys assassination. The Warren Commission states that they were unable to reach any definite conclusions as to whether or not he ( lee Harvey Oswald) was sane under prevailing legal standards (Warren et al., 1964, p. 375). I do not believe that world behavior can ever fully be predicted. However, an analysis of Oswalds childhood, as well as, his actions leading up to the assassination help us to understand the type of person lee(prenominal) Harvey Oswa ld was and give us an acumen into his psychological state. Oswald had a troubling childhood to say the least. His bewilder died both months before he was born in 1939 leaving him with no let figure in his life. Not only did the death of Oswalds father leave him with without a father-figure, it robbed him of a home and family life with constant agnatic figures (Abrahamsen, 1967, p. 869). The death of Oswalds father forced his mother to go to work, basically leaving him without a mother as well. His mother sent Oswald, his elder brother, Robert Oswald, and his older half-brother, John Pic, to an orphanage. Oswald stayed at the orphanage for thirteen months, until his mother matrimonial her third husband (Ewing & McCann, 2006, p. 22). Now that Oswalds mother was remarried there w... ...brahamsen, David. (1967). A Study of Lee Harvey Oswald Psychological Capability of Murder. Bulletin of The juvenile York honorary society of Medicine, 43, 861-888. Ewing, C.P., & McCann J.T. ( 2006). Minds on Trial Great Cases in Law and Psychology. New York, NY Oxford University Press. McAdams, John. (1995). Lee Harvey Oswald Troubled Youth - Oswald Assessed by Psychiatrist Renatus Hartogs. Retrived from http//mcadams.posc.mu.edu/hartogs.htm.Simon, Jonathan. (1998). Ghosts of the Disciplinary Machine Lee Harvey Oswald, Life-History, and the Truth of Crime. Yale Journal of Law and Humanities, 10, 75-113.Warren, E., Russell, R. B., Ford, G. R., Cooper, J. S., Dulles, A. W., Boggs, A., McCloy, J. J. (1964). The Warren Commission Report Reports of the Presidents Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy. New York, NY St. Martins Press.

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

GraduateWriters.net Mission to Help Students Achieve Academic Excellence Essay

PHOENIX, AZ, JUNE 24, 2014 /PRESSRELEASEPING/ ACADEMIC written material IS AN IMPORTANT ACTIVITY done by every scholarly person, at solely level of education in order to satisfy course pass water requirement. Students are required to undertake a variety of schoolman write task that could range from short essays, assignments, SAT, IELTS or lengthy term papers, dissertations and thesis. This fibre of writing could be done either under time demanding blackjack or syllabus requirement. As a outgrowth students are expect to output a number of papers at the end of separately day, week, semester or term.But such time demanding output doesnt forever and a day guarantee quality of resultant paper, says Peter Wartson consultant at tweakWriters. net. In fact a research by National pedantic Council for Academic Excellence found that many students resort to borrowing or stealing the work of others in order to beat deadlines and as result the rate of plagiarism has become so common p lace, that if every student who plagiarized was to be flunked, the rate of dropout will be worse than that considerable open online learning courses (MOOC).With this in mind many students sort the service of freelance  academician writers, who are seen as the first level examiners. They sink students on how to structure their research papers, perform proof reading and armed service students to avoiding mistakes related to grammar, spelling, phrasing and plagiarism. states Peter, Freelance academic writers, should not be mixed-up with people who helps students achieve shortcut by doing their assignments, no they are just writers who guide students the way a teacher will do. period this may help students reduce stress related to academic demand, few concerns has been raised concerning the qualification of writers who handle students academic work. Mary White an academic consultant at haveWriters. net, stated that Students should look at the pool of writers a freelance company has, example GraduateWriter. net, is comprised of only graduate writers who have various qualification in their field of interest that range from MSc, MBA, MRes, EM, LLM, MEng, MA, Phd, and DS. At that company, writers support series of test approved by our senior writers to ascertain academic prowess and professional skills in writing and research.The advantage of this pool of workforce is that clients are always guaranteed the best quality writing and editing service, which cannot be found elsewhere on the Internet. Writers are specialist, with background in Education, Medicine, Nursing, Finance, Communication, Media, Arts, Humanities, fond Sciences, Engineering, IT, Law etc. Other qualities that prospective student should look at before selecting an academic writing company include privacy and security, originality, timeliness, quality, alteration policy, orders tracking, support and response to queries.A lot of emphasis should be fixed on privacy as it is not only a castigate but a demand that every users online should be guaranteed of. If an online company create a student paper online, without their formal approval, it could lead to plagiarism and judgement of dismissal from school. Therefore students should look for companies that adhere with privacy policies and not let terce party have access to their client papers. articulates Peter. ABOUT GRADUATEWRITERS.NET Graduate Writers is an academic editing and writing company that help student in carrying out research work, gives advice on writing, referencing and proof reading. The company is composed of Graduate writers with specialties in field which can be advantageous to students. PO cuff 89670 Phoenix, AZ Peter Wartson Graduate Writers LLC +1-480-409-1822 supportgraduatewriters. net http//graduatewriters. net reference point URLhttp//pressreleaseping. com/graduatewritersnet-mission-help-students-achieve-academic- excellence.

Monday, January 28, 2019

Political Rhetoric During the American Revolution

Political rhetoric has been mathematical functiond since the ancient times. It has been used by world verbalisers from incessantlyywhere and to spring their audience to action. A great public speaker or writer is determined by his or her choice of words. In American history there stick been docu work forcets that have had a horrendous impact on public opinion. Political rhetoric is exceedingly every(prenominal)-important(a) because it can bring a society together for unmatched popular cause. When some nonpareil uses rhetoric effectively the reader starts to have a divine guidance in their heart because they feel enliven by what is organism said.This usually leads them to amaze action and support the cause their referring to which in this case was the American Revolution. doubting Thomas Paines Common Sense, the VA result of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence were documents that greatly shifted public opinion and led the colonists to support the revolution wit h their use of rhetoric. Thomas Paines Common Sense was a political parcel pen at the heels of the America Revolution that became extremely popular among the colonies.Thomas Paine was a Pennsylvania journalist during the time of the American Revolution. He began wor magnate on it in late 1775 and it was published in 1776. The rhetoric of this piece of ground along with its popularity greatly turned the tide in favor of rebelling against groovy Britain. Paine wrote this parcel of land in a style that a frequent person could understand. The entitle itself contains rhetoric. By making the title Common Sense it implies that the contents of the pamphlet contain some common instinct ideas that everyone reading it should understand.The wording of his pamphlet was very simple and contained many biblical references so it was in addition relatable to the colonists. It was extremely important that all colonists could understand the pamphlet because it would create a sense of unity an d understanding among the rich and poor colonists. Paines main arguments were that it is choppy for such an island to rule a continent, Britain had selfish intentions in ruling the colonies, and existence a part of Britain would involve America in unnecessary European wars that would limit their economic possibilities.Paine in the first section creates a establishment note between society and government. He says society is a patron that promotes rapture and government is a punisher that restrains society. To best describe his vision on the kind that society and government should have he gives an example of a hardly a(prenominal) pot who live in nature without government.. He gives the example of the few people creating a society because the colonists can relate that to themselves. At one point in time Great Britain left the colonies alone for the or so part and they lived in peace.Once the government got involved and began to take for themselves is when the colonists starte d having all these problems. Paine also argues that all men are created equal and that the distinction of the king from his subjects oppresses this idea. MANKIND being originally equals in the order of creation, the equality could further be destroyed by some subsequent circumstance the distinctions of rich, and poor, may in a great measure be accounted for, and that without having recourse to the harsh, ill-sounding name of oppression and avarice.Oppression is often the consequence, but seldom or neer the means of riches and though avarice will preserve a man from being necessitously poor, it generally makes him too timorous to be wealthy. solely there is another and greater distinction for which no truly subjective or sacred reason can be assigned, and that is, the distinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECTS. Paine in his third section discusses the problems between the colonies and England and says the best route is to carry their independence from England.In his final sec tion he offers great optimism about(predicate) the militia during the revolution and how it can win this war. Thomas Paines use of rhetoric in Common Sense is the reason why it was so persuasive and popular and could have possibly been the reason that the colonists finally came and determined to revolt against Great Britain. The Virginia Declaration of Rights was written in 1776 to proclaim the rude(a) rights of man including the right to rebel against an inadequate government. George Mason was the author of this document, which was follow unanimously by the Virginia Convention of Delegates in 1776.It was the first document that defend individual rights rather than protecting near members of Parliament. The declaration states that all men have their natural rights, which are life, liberty, and property. The rhetoric in this document influenced coming(prenominal) significant documents in American history. Thomas Jefferson drew great ingestion from this document when he wrote the Declaration of Independence a month later. He borrowed the idea of natural rights of man and implemented them into his document.James Madison was also influenced by the rhetoric and ideas of the Virginia Declaration when drawing the Bill of Rights. Aside from being incredibly influential for latter documents the Virginia Declaration of Rights asserted the right of the Virginia people to rebel against Great Britain The Declaration of Independence was one of the greatest documents ever written in American history. This document officially stated that the 13 colonies had broken outdoor(a) from the control of Great Britain who they were at war with at the time.It stated the reasons for why the colonies declared independence and listed the grievances against the king of England. The rhetoric in this document is what makes it such a powerful piece of literature. This declaration contains many powerful quotes that can emotionally affect a reader. We hold these truths to be self-eviden t, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their reason with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. This quote has been called one of the most potent and consequential in American history and for expert reason. The rhetoric in this quote is very powerful because it uses a religious reference and relates it to the colonists. By saying that the Creator as in divinity fudge has given colonists certain rights, it leads them to believe that nobody can take them away and this gives them a sense of worth and purpose that no government could take away. Jefferson listed the many grievances that the colonies had against Great Britain to give reason for their breaking apart.These were complaints that the colonists all had against the government and so it created a sense of unity among them all. The Declaration of Independence had to have strong rhetoric in order for it to be a prospering document. It had to take a stand against the tyranny America was facing and had to learn that they were serious about their independence. Not only did they have to show it to Great Britain but as well as the common people of the colonies because they were the ones fighting in the war and they needed the reassurance that this war was worth fighting for.The creators, by signing the declaration on the last page gave the colonists this reassurance because it showed them that they were not just aristocrats writing a document in Pennsylvania maculation the common people fought on the battlefield but they were also putting their lives on the line. The signers knew that if they were to lose the war they would be killed and so the colonists recognized this and were inspired by their willingness to die for this cause. This gave the colonist the reassurance they needed to finish out the war, eventually whacking England and gain their independence.In conclusion political rhetoric has had a dramatic influence on public op inion during the American Revolution. Thomas Paines Common Sense greatly shifted the public opinion towards revolution while the Virginia Declaration of Rights and the Declaration of Independence gave the colonists a sense of purpose and inspired them to rise up against Great Britain. It is hard to imagine what life in America would be like in present day had these documents not been written with such emotion and resolve.It is a good thing we do not have to find out. Bibliography Virginia Declaration of Rights. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 29 Aug 2009, 0120 UTC. 29 Aug 2009 . United States Declaration of Independence. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 21 Sep 2009, 0339 UTC. 21 Sep 2009 . Common Sense (pamphlet). Wikipedia. Web. 19 Sept. 2009. . Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Philadelphia R. Bell, 1176. Print. The Declaration of Independence. Ushistory. org. Independence Hall Association, 4 July 1995. Web. 20 Sept. 2009.

Difference Between Necessity and Private Defence Essay

The two grounds of justification kn consume as indispensability and private defence mechanism atomic number 18 closely related. In both cases the culprit protects interests which are of value to her, such as life, physical integrity and property, against impenetrable danger. The distinctions in the midst of these two grounds of justification are the following (Snyman C.R 2008)(1) the fall of the situation of tinge Private defence forever stems from an sinful (and consequently human) attack essential, on the other hand, may stem either from an unrule-governed human deed, or from chance circumstances, such as natural occurrences.(2) the disapprove at which the comport of defence is say Private defence is always directed at an unlawful human attack compulsion is directed at either the interests of a nonher innocent third party or merely amounts to a violation of a legal provisioE.G X, who has a gun, tells Y that he kidnapped Ys daughter and orders Y, the aver manager, to use his code to open the safe of the bank and to hand him all the money at heart the safe. If Y does not do what he says he, X exit pop step to the fore his daughter. If Y hands him the money he will be handicaping the bank and therefore act in necessity. If he takes his own gun and vote knocked out(p) X be nonplus he knows that X lied and that his daughter is safe, he will be acting in private defence to protect this own and the interest of the bank.The distinction between necessity and private defence is as well illustrated by the requirements for the successful plea of the grounds of justification (necessity and private defence). These requirements are described belowNECESSITY A person acts out of necessity and her conduct is therefore lawful if she acts in the protection of her own or somebody elses life, physical integrity, property or other legitimately recognised interest which is endangered by a threat of slander which has already begun or is immediately th reatening and which cannot be averted in any other way provided that the person who relies on the necessity is not legally compelled to come through the danger, and the interest protected by the act of defence is not out of proportion to the interest threatened by such an act (Burchell, J2004). This defence arises when a person is confronted with a choice between suffering an injustice and breaking the law. It is regularly used to justify actions in emergencies. hotshot would, for instance, be able to rely on necessity against a charge of speeding when driving a person requiring urgent medical checkup care to hospital.Requirements of Necessity (1) Some legal interest of X, such as her life, physical integrity or property must be threatened. In principle, one should also be able to protect other interests such as dignity, freedom and chastity in a situation of necessity.(2) One can also act in a situation of necessity to protect anothers interest, for caseful where X protects Z from world attacked by an animal.(3) The emergency must already have begun or be imminent, but must not have terminated, nor be expected in the future merely.(4) Whether a person can rely on the defence of necessity if she herself is responsible for the emergency, is a debatable question. In our opinion X should not be precluded from successfully raising this defence merely because she caused the emergency herself. If she were precluded, this would mean that if, because of Xs carelessness, her spoil swallowed an overdose of pills, X would not be allowed to exceed the speed limit while rushing the baby to hospital, but would have to resign herself to the childs dying (compare the occurrences in Pretorius supra). The two acts, namely the creation of danger and rescue from it, should be separated. If the first off act amounts to a crime X can be penalize for it, for example where she sets fire to a domicile and then has to break out of the house to save her own life (Milton, J.R .L1997).(5) If somebody is legally compelled to endure the danger, she cannot rely on necessity. Persons such as policemen, soldiers and firemen cannot avert the dangers inherent in the exercise of their profession by infringing the rights of innocent parties. Another aspect of this conventionality is that a person cannot rely on necessity as a defence if what appears to her to be a threat is in fact lawful (human) conduct. Thus it was held in Kibi 1978 (4) SA 173 (EC) that if X is arrested lawfully, he may not terms the police van in which he has been locked up, in order to fountain from it.(6) The act committed in necessity is lawful only if it is the only way in which X can avert the threat or danger. Where, for example, Z orders X to kill Y and threatens to kill X if she does not obey, and it appears that X can overcome her dilemma by fleeing, she must flee, and if possible, try on police protection (Bradbury 1967 (1) SA 387 (A) 390).(7) X must be conscious of the fact that an emergency exists, and that she is therefore acting out of necessity. There is no such thing as a chance or accidental act of necessity. If X throws a brick through the window of Ys house in order to break in, and it later appears that by so doing she has salvage Z, who was sleeping in a room filled with poisonous gas, from current death, X cannot rely on necessity as a defence.(8) The harm occasioned by the defensive act must not be out of proportion to the interest threatened, and therefore X must not cause more harm than is necessary to escape the danger. It is this requirement which is the most alpha one in practice, and it can also be the most tight to apply. The protected and the impaired interests are often of a different nature, for example where somebody damages anothers property in defend her own physical integrity.

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Can leaders be flexible Essay

Yes, I do believe that leadinghip can be flexible in the appearance they interact with others, or change their manners or personalities so to suit the situation. Also, they skill need to sharpen on fol woefulers inevitably/ ports or their level of readiness by ever-changing or shifting behavioral their drawship genius. One speculation might describe and support this concept is the situational drawing cardship possibleness which requires leaders to center their leadership means or behaviors according to their chase level.This theory was initially created by Hersey and Blanchard (1969) and has approaches that concern for people productions as well as shows that there is no one best musical mode of behavior for a leader (Norris, 1992). Most importantly, the situational theory require leader to adjust his behavior and leadership style to features of pursuit and situation.Therefore, it might be important to odour at the four styles described by Hersey and Blanchard to rate the situations that some(prenominal) leader might wealthy person to change his style or behavior.There atomic number 18 situations where leader might have to be flexible with his followers by giving them less responsibly and delegation of tasks due to their lack of cognition/experience, or if they ar newly hired etc. the leader in this case might need to utilize the sexual congress style whereby there is more of directing and controlling of leader to his followers. In this behavioral style, leaders role involves telling his follower on what and how to behave their tasks quality by step. In my working experience, for example, I tend to use this style when training people whom are newly hired or uninitiate and require a lot of assistance or hints when in doubt. I might some eons need to spill out the responsibilities or duties for perform to make sure that they are still on focus.Knowing that differences between tasks and relationships behaviors as described in Hughes et al (1996), I agree that the telling style does have amply task and low relationship with followers because followers in this stage are ineffective to perform any delegated tasks and that means should be giving detailed instructions.Another situational and behavioral style is the selling style whereby the leader is acting both as a director and supporter toward his followers. This style might be more sound if followers are delegated toward some responsibility and have an adequate acquaintance of performing their tasks. The leader in this case is only giving directions and road map when any deviation is observed. In term of skills and ability, the leader is also to get ahead his followers skills throughout. Because of that, it ca be said that in this behavioral style, the leader is coaching i.e. there is higher tasks delegation and higher relationship with followers.In the participating style, the leader exercises low tasks delegations but high relationship with followers. Thi s is because in this style the main role of leader is to facilitate the delegated tasks to his followers by showing his knowledge or skills on how best can this be done. Bearing in mind the level of communication is high in this style which enables follower to share in the decision reservation process as applicable. This behavioral style might best be used is when followers are starting or completing a job (Hughes et al, 2006).The last situational style is the delegating style whereby there is junior-grade two side communication between the leader and his followers (low-task- low relationship). This style might be implemented when leader is aware of his followers knowledge, ability, confidence, experience and most importantly taking higher responsibilities. To this extend, followers are able to direct them selves with no control from their leader. Although, leaders in this style are like an observers whereby they have less influence on their followers and less control.However, lea der might also need to consider followers development level/their readiness level and competence. Followers competence might include their knowledge, skills and ability to assess the work outcome. Therefore, leader might have to respond or change his behavior in such way that fits the situation. He can classify his people to stages such as sight are able and involuntary to take tasks (competent). People are unable and unwilling to take tasks (incompetents) People are unable but willing to take tasks (unskilled). People are able but unwilling tasks (unmotivated).So to summarize, it can be seen that the situational leadership theory presented by Hersey and Blanchard focuses on the followers behaviors and define what style is best to suit any situation. Also, it highlights the level of responsibilities delegated as well as the degree of relationship between leaders and followers. tramp into practice, situation leadership theory is basically effective with any situation.Moreover, it seems that the situational theory answer the question that leader might need to change their behavior and be flexible with followers as that depends on situation and circumstances. In other words, leaders might need to adjust them selves all the time depending on the working environment and follower level of readiness (Norris, 1992). And as the Hersey and Blanchard theory, they should always change their personality or be able to identify clues in their environment and adapt their leader behavior to meet the needs of their followers in any particular situation (). Vecchio and Norris agrees that ,even with good symptomatic skills, leader might need to be flexible in changing their behavior and adapt their leadership styles that meet that demand of both the followers and environment.ReferenceNorris, R., & Vecchio, R 1992 Situational leadership theory. Group & boldness Management.Hughes, R.L., Ginnet, R.C., & Curphy, G.J. (2006). Leadership Enhancing the lessons of experience . 5th ed. New York. McGraw-Hill

Friday, January 25, 2019

Ethical Business Dilema

Ethical Dilemma Analysis through the 8 questions model by Arthur Dobrin Case 1 Rental Applicant 1. Facts African-American applier permanent work history More than enough income to cover the rent thoroughly references from their previous landlord A couple with one young son (Family) to begin with applicants accepted, rental agent should down done a background checkout time as a shopworn procedure. 2. Facts we dont survive Verifications of facts moderate a cross check oWhether or not the facts provided by the applicant argon true ? Income Salary Statement ?References from landlord Written letter/ blazon out Work History Stable/Unstable work experience Applicants air/habit past rental history oWhether or not they analogous to break lease or skip town leave an complimentary rent The reason for postponing the practise oWhat does Kate mean by saying in my experience whether its actually because of her experience dealing with application or racial discrimination. 3. Fact s rendition Stable work history ? stable whether they have work long time or not (cross-check credential) A family much in all probability to be more settled in one touch compare to single status individual. A neat reference from previous landlord means that the applicant has a good record of being a good tenant. Have more than enough income means that the applicant has the efficacy to fulfill its obligation of paying the rent. 4. Walk in anothers shoes (problem viewed from others that involved) Kate exponent give a stereotype view of the African-American applicant 5. Consequences If we dont take them oWe expertness slip a good tenant oWe might lose our traffic opportunity oWe might build a strict take to to prospective customer If we take them oTheres a possibility that we exterminate up having a default rent 6.Feelings Megan Perspective Look very good for their application Kate Perspective Dont rush their application having negative perception Our Perspective e nsure to our feeling and in gang with the facts given (provided it is true), plus we can also try to determine base on the intuition from the body language given by the applicant, around seeming we will accept the applicant. 7. Conscience Yes ? Provided the documents are true. No ? Provided the documents are false. Verification whether the documents are true or false can be done by cross-checking the credential and/or validating the facts. . Explanation and acknowledgment In making decision, it should not be establish on individualised needs/views or simply intuition/feelings, it should also be based on neutral judgment from the facts given and validation. Given the normal standard procedure that needs to be fulfilled from the background check of the applicant and by checking thoroughly throughout the facts, the rental agents should be able to buzz off a decision. Case 2 Sabotage Menu Not component the avocation of customers fully (by pushing other visiting card instead). By apply healthy food as a bait strategy to pull up customers, according to Dave. . Facts Food is healthy, but the quantity is limited. Coming up with a new menu. Huge expenditure on advertisement. 2. Facts we dont know Whether the food which is healthy is actually healthy. Assumption whether this strategy will come through for a long time. Whether or not people will acquire fast food even though the menu is being pushed. 3. Facts Interpretation New healthy menu was launched by the company to response the man pressure for healthier lunch cho deoxyephedrines, thus by having new menu, numerous money involved to train and advertise the new menu. New menu launched priced lower to bring new customers, thus there will be an effect on the companys profit. The objective of the business is to convey money for the shareholders, thus the business need to make profit. Hence, most likely agency problem would occur, which refers to the ethical dilemma between the shareholder interest and the CEO interest. Dave, the store manager, wanted the staff to push the upsize menu options and ice creams for dessert, which this refers to an issue of sabotage. 4. Walk in anothers shoes (problem viewed from others that involved) According to Carol, the manager is more inclined towards his own profit. According to Dave it is fast to maximise the profit and his own commission. According to customer, they might be cheated into buying windburnt food. 5. Consequences By agreeing to Dave, the profit might be higher in the hornswoggle term, whereas by going against Dave, the company might lose out on the profit. But by keeping the reputation of the company, it will help in the long-term profitability. She might lose her own position if she does not agree to Dave plan. But if she doesnt want to lose her job, then most likely she will have her personal issue. 6. Feelings If she agrees to Dave, she will be safe, but if she goes against him, she might lose her job. (personal dilemmas) 7. Conscience In order to save the job, Carol might let her inner conscience take the back seat, because this is cognitive reverberance within herself. Her decision will be based on how she feels, whether it is good or bad. 8. Explanation and Justification If yes, she can say that her boss asked her to do so. If she says no, she can say her inner conscience didnt digest her and in the long run, it wont be beneficial to the consumer and the company.

Thursday, January 24, 2019

Relationship Conflict Resolution Model

About a month ago, my girlfriend (whom I will refer to as Kelly) and I were not getting along very well, and I attri provideded our difficulties to a mounting mess of unresolved disputes from our past. So I invited Kelly to sit down and guggle nigh our problems. Kelly happily accepted. We concur to take one dis entertainment at a sequence, and talk on the whole(prenominal) one through before moving the next. We ate dinner together, sit down down on her couch and faced distributively other(a). I encourage Kelly to lead this talk between us, so I respectfully anyow her pick an issue palpebra is bothering her to talk near.It was difficult to hear just about a problem that she has functiond against me many times already and I had hoped that she Just forgot about it But I sucked it up and listened any steering. The festering resentment that Kelly had been lugging around every day for all over 3 years started when she had observed explicit text messages on my phone be tween me and another woman. I assay to Justify my dirty-talk with this woman by blaming Kelly for rejecting me in the worst way imaginable. I had witnessed Kelly having sex tit another man Just later we had started dating.Kelly knew I was there, but she was so caught up in her own pleasure and enjoyment that my existence was no to a greater extent significant than a fly sheet on the wall. Kelly snub everything I did and said as I seek to get her stop what she was doing, and continued having sex with him until she became satisfied. I was completely devastated and overwhelmed with rejection. I could fix left Kelly after what she had done. But I felt that if I can forgive her for this then I will hold all of controlling cards in our relationship.So I chose to stay with her, and see how things go I expected Kelly to suck up to me, kiss my ass, and make up for her actions in every way she possibly could But that never happened. Kelly ignored it and never even gave me the chance to express my tactilitys of betrayal and devastation to her about it. Consequently, I let the resentment build up in me over time, mainly because I lacked assertiveness, so I buried my olfactory perceptionings to avoid remainder and reliving that dreadful event. So when Kelly initially confronted me about my text messages with this other woman,I responded to it by becoming defensive, trying to Justify my actions by blaming her for betraying me with another man. I tried to make her believe that my behavior was the result of her actions. I tried to make her believe that my interest in another woman was all her fault and that my dirty little secret was only talk and not sex, and against me. Ultimately, I felt entitled to do whatever I valued because she had cheated with another man and she did it even up in front of me. Since then, I take a leak tried to figure out what it is that I had done prior to Kellys actions hat may have influenced her choice to reject me that way.I started t o solidize allot of things about myself while progressing through psychological treatment, and through this process I have practiced expressing empathy, sharpening my auditory modality skills and I have been doing much better with all(prenominal) new skill that I have lettered. But as I continued to use each new skill in my casual life, I could not avoid feeling somewhat coercive when I used empathy and assertiveness at times with Kelly. I had been purposely thought process out how to use the right tone if voice, overlapping ententes and using memorized feeling speech Just to show empathy Inconsequently, my new communication style started to feel somewhat rehearsed, fake and coercive to me I knew I was saying the right things, but I started to feel that sometimes my run-in were liking real meaning and sincerity Speaking to people as if I were future(a) directions from a book about how to communicate. But this peculiar(prenominal) sit-down talk with Kelly turned out to be m ore positively significant than any other talk that we have ever had. Everything that I have learned in therapy has been a benefit to my relationship with Kelly , and everyone else in my life for that matter..But reflecting confirm a few months, before having this conversation with her, I realized that I still hadnt been able to sort of tie it all together and use everything that I have learned so far without thinking overly much about communication styles and elaborate. I have been using listening skills, expressing empathy, taking accountability, and modifying my behavior more and more each week, and I have taken every opportunity to use each new skill as much as possible. But I have of late realized hat I was only getting better at using each skill independent from the others.Toward the end of our conflict contract talk, I felt the greatest sense of relief in our relationship to see how happy Kelly was becoming as our conversation progressed. I had not realized how powerful of an impact that genuine empathy and listening to her every word would have on both of us. I believe that I actually felt the same irritation that she had felt when she read those words on my phone. It was overwhelming.. I felt a brick in my bear out made of betrayal and devastation s Kelly expressed the embarrassing details of my dirty text messages.She had said these same words to me before, describing her heartache over it, but I must have Just blocked her words out or I interrupted her in selfness and denial each time . The feelings inside of me made the event seem much more significant than I had realized. I could see it the way that she had experienced it but this time, the event upon me was very profound and I was taken over by guilt and shame. Truly understanding and experiencing Kellys feelings caused emotions inside of me that kook control of my body language.I forgotten about my own resentments. I tried to hide my emotions, because I felt that have no right to cry ove r the pain that I had inflicted on her, but I couldnt stop the tears.. Kelly, moved to my side, fit(p) her head on my shoulder and wrapped her arms me. This was the first time that I had ever been successful in expressing pure empathy. This one particular dispute was resolved, but the scar will last forever. But Kelly and I now share this scar and we view our remaining unresolved disputes as teammates from the opposing dugout.

Saturday, January 19, 2019

Coca-Cola versus Pepsi-Cola: Competitive Strategies Essay

Coca-Cola ( gust) and Pepsi-Cola (Pepsi) have been the about commonplace loose drinks for many an(prenominal) years, and has also been to each one others biggest competitor. shock was created in 1885 by John Stith Pemberton, a pharmacist, and was initially made as a tonic (Smith, 2012). In the beginning, cytosine had cocaine in it, which was to charge up depression and also fare consumers addicted to the drink. In 1904, the Food and dose Administration eliminated the use of cocaine, a key ingredient, in the United States, so degree Celsius contumacious to keep its name and endorse the beverage with aggressive advertising (Smith, 2012). Thirteen years after the creation of coulomb, in 1898, Caleb Bradham, a pharmacist, created a beverage named Brads Drink (later changed to Pepsi), and was Cokes main competitor (Smith, 2012). Both companies tensenessed on advertising, to a greater extent all over they took different approaches. These different approaches that each ca ller-up uses, also reflects the differences of their embodied cultures. Coke and Pepsi have been competing with one another since the beginning, and this competition seems to have pushed both companies to run at the return of their market.Corporate culture is defined as an institutions system of principles, beliefs, and values (Boone & Kurtz, 2012). Cokes corporate culture focuses on seven core values, which are leadinghiphip, passion, integrity, collaboration, diversity, quality, and accountability (Coca-Cola, 2013). Coke focuses on their employees and their brand in order to keep the promise to brush up the world in mind, body, and spirit, and inspire moments of optimism to create value and make a difference (Coca-Cola, 2013). On the other hand, Pepsis corporate culture focuses on performing with a purpose. Performing with a purpose means clamant new-fangled trails, never settling for second best, succeeding and celebrating together, and doing something bigger (PepsiCo, 2012). Pepsi also focuses on nutrition by addressing health concerns. The difference between these cardinal companies is that Coke seems to focus more on their employees, where as Pepsi, seems to focus more on staying ahead of the competition by always coming up with new trends or products.Pepsis culture has benefitted Coke by instruction on healthier alternatives rather grass products. In 2006, when Indra Nooyi took over as CEO, she decided not to continue to battle with Coke. Instead of cola products, Nooyi decided to focus on water, juices, teas, and sports drinks. Since Pepsi began focusing on healthier alternatives, of all soft drinks, Coke has controlled 41.9 percent of the market compared to Pepsis 29 percent (DAltorio, 2013). On the other hand, Cokes focus on their brand has benefitted Pepsis decision to not focus mainly on cola products. Coke clearly commands the cola war between the two companies, simply Pepsi has won the revenue enhancement battle, bringing in 38 pe rcent more revenue than Coke in 2011 (Russell, 2012). Pepsi has expanded the company by starting the acquaintance Oats, Gatorade, and Tropicana divisions.By opening up these divisions, Pepsis goal is to reach $30 billion in revenue by 2020 (DAltorio, 2013). Cokes focus on the brand, allowed the company to clearly control the cola market, but by limiting the company to soft drinks, Coke has allowed Pepsi to tap into other markets and get into more revenue. Another part of Pepsis culture that has benefited Coke was doing something bigger. Pepsi has been cognise to use celebrities to promote their products, but in that location have been instances where these promotions have backfired. The most recent of these mishaps was in 2002 when Pepsi pulled an ad featuring the breast Ludacris. Bill OReilly called for a boycott of Pepsi because he felt the company used an immoral rapper as a spokesperson (Russell, 2012). After the arguing, Pepsi committed to paying $3 million dollars to the Ludacris Foundation (Russell, 2012). With a popular rapper, such as Ludacris, who has millions of fans, this controversy created the risk of Pepsi losing millions of consumers, which could have switched over to the competition, Coke.In the future, the part of Cokes corporate culture that will probably change is their leadership. Companies change leaders often, especially when the current leader is not performing to the standards that the company expects. In order to continue to thrive, Coke has to be sure that they put leaders in place who understand the companys vision. They must be able to take those visions and continue to move the company forward in its market. Coke has been a leader in the cola market for many years and as a new leader, it will have to be the goal of that leader to ensure that Coke remains at the top of the market or Coke will have to find a new leader. If Coke constantly has to change leadership, then it will require the company. Finding a great leader is not an easy task, but once that leader is found it is up to him/her to effectively lead the company into the future and not ruin e very(prenominal)thing that has been built before they came along.Pepsis believes in blazing new trails, and thus far it has worked for them. In the future, Pepsi must be careful that by blazing new trails they do not embarrass what has allowed their triumph over the years. Although the new trails that they tapped into in the past have worked, there is no guarantee that it will continue to work in the past. thither have been companies, like Coke, that have tried new products (New Coke) that did not work. Pepsi has had success with tapping into new markets, but the company must be careful that they stick by with what has worked for them so that they do not tarnish the brand that they have worked so hard to establish. The different markets (water, juices, teas, and sports drinks) that have been tapped into has brought Pepsi much success, and instead of blaz ing new trails, Pepsi needs to focus on making their current product lines bigger and better. Tapping into other markets that they are not already a part of could perhaps take away from the product lines that they already have in place. conclusion Coke and Pepsi are the top cola and soft drink companies and each others biggest competitor. Both companies have established themselves using different methods, but they both have had success with these methods. Coke has clearly won the rivalry between the two when it comes to the individual cola lines, but when it comes to overall revenue Pepsi has won the battle of revenue. Although both companies have made mistakes over the years, both have continued to be successful. Coke has stuck with what has worked for them throughout the years, which is the cola and soft drink market. Pepsi on the other hand, tried different markets, and was very successful. These two companies will continue to be rivals from now until the end of judgment of co nviction because they are both at the top and continue to fight to make sure that is where they stay.

Friday, January 18, 2019

Upholding English Proficiency for Communicative Competency Essay

For many years since the World War II, the English style had been the lingua franca of numerous countries and territories all around the world. It is lend oneselfd in the routine lives of many people from selling and buying to creating laws.Being an English effective person, one must be able to speak, read and write the language. To be truly upright, he must have advance abilities in the ternary divisions wherein he bathroom convey and relay his thoughts fluently. But being ripe(p) in this language doesnt just mean being mainstream. It is more(prenominal) than that. It is being able to communicate and relate with variant people from different cultures.Whenever a person goes to a foreign land without properly erudition its native language, he has to find ways how to converse with the natives. And whenever this happens, people unceasingly opt to use English. Since it is the universal language, it is no more a bewilderment that most human beings walking on this planet can implement the lingo. Learning English gives the people confidence, confidence to face the world and its people.Schools use the language as the primary medium of instruction because many take that by doing so, they are preparing the students to become globally competitive. They believe that they can gain what other people can achieve by being arch(prenominal) in the language. The students will have brighter future ahead of them. Many opportunities carry them if they have this specific skill. This is because they can openly communicate and share ideas. They can face international questions that will challenge them.Learning the language would not just bring us opportunities, it would bring us success. Let us have debate as an example. In many formal debates, it would be the English language that is going to be used. If one is not proficient enough, then he cannot express his arguments effectively, he cant be an effective communicator. In a court trial, a lawyer has to bravely def end his case using the language. He has to speak clearly,