Mass Incarceration in the United Kingdom

our site SOCIAL SCIENCE DISSERTATION usance ESSAY WRITING IntroductionThe joined Kingdom has recently witnessed an growing in the number of prison houseers incarcerated. The first surge occurred during superlative Minister Thatchers reign. Running a prison became a business, when the first privately streamlet institution opened in the United Kingdom, in 1992 (Panchamia 2012). The increase enquire for spaces due to higher(prenominal) rate of imprisonment led to the proceeds of the prison-industrial complex, whereby citizenry were incarcerated without a mechanism for reintegrating them back to the edict. Prisons became contracted out, and the influence of the government was reduced. As Panchamia (2012) concludes, ten percent of the prisons in the United Kingdom and Wales ar shortly contracted out. Davis (1998 3) states while government-run prisons are often in gross rape of international human rights standards, private prisons are even less responsible.The emergence of th ese prison-industrial complexes is attributed to the criminological theory, hinged on the conflict theory, arguing that t thither is a struggle between different groups (Akers 1979 527).Crime is perceived as a function of the conflict within any union based on Marxist theory, calmingthat well-disposed and scotch situations facilitate criminal activities. This paper argues that the emergence of the prison-industrial complex in England and Wales was attributed to batch enslavement, the lack of effective complaisant insurance, and primal interventions.Mass IncarcerationMass internment is characterized by the removal of flock from communities and taking them to prisons. (Newburn 2002 165). Sparks and McNeill (2009) define jackpot internment as restricting the license of a group of people, subjecting them to surveillance and regulation, while increasing their dependency. According to a recent publication by Wacquant (2001), the plain aim of prison complexes and mass incar ceration is to segregate people. The author goes further, and compares prisons with Ghettos. Focusing in the American context, the hold highlights the impact of curriculum segregation on the demographics of prison population. The above disceptation is powerful, as both prisons and ghettos are considered to be places extremely hard to break out from. The main aim of mass incarceration is to remove the criminal from the vicinity to ensure that they are detained. Often this priority marrow that prisoners are denied rehabilitative facilities (Harnett 2011 7). As an implication, prisons become areas for punitive segregation, for the criminals who must be removed from the society. Therefore, just about of these prisons are detention centres where people enter a perpetual bike of incarceration for aversions committed because of their economic need.Davis (1998) states that prisons are not providing adequate declaration for crime or social issues. The author goes further, claimi ng that prisons reflect that racial bias and social injustice of the society. Studying American prison population, the author states that the policy-making economy of prisons relies on racialized assumptions of criminality such as images of black benefit mothers reproducing criminal children and on racist practices in arrest, conviction, and sentencing patterns (Davis 1998 2). The defining features of mass incarceration are that it is characterized by comparatively high number of people in prisons. In Reagans United States prosecution patterns and conviction rates increased the proportionate representation of African Americans and Hispanics, as well as those from subvert socio-economic statuses (Wacquant 2010, p. 74). This was during the New Deal and Great Society, which contributed a lot towards the increasing purport of mass incarcerations, and the adoption of the prison-industrial complex system that emphasized governance through punitive acts (Downes 2001, p. 62).At the advent of economic reforms introduced by Britains Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, the rising rate of unemployment hit the plying distinguish the most. With the labour food market in crisis,urban areas had to bear the burden of the high proportion of lower class and unemployed population. As social issues increased, the government resorted to the creation of a prison-industrial complex, to jazz with the people that suffered most (Wehr 2015, p. 6). The newly created prison-industrial complex that emphasized mass incarceration was based on cultural bias and social injustice (Sparks and McNeill, 2009). These institutions symbolised thee societys thoughts and prejudice, suggesting that the degradation of a person may be a way to solve the social conflict. As a result, the British society started to increasingly rely on criminological theories to support mass incarceration of the lower classes, whereby the prison-industrial complexes become a large enterprise for the sta te.Democracy, Inclusion and genial PolicyIt is worth noting that mass incarceration in England and Wales led to the economic and social exclusion of people within the prisons. This segregation and incarceration menace democracy (Sparks and McNeill, 2009). In line with the conflict criminological theory, mass incarceration of offenders who mostly belong to a particular race or class enhanced the structures of oppression and privilege (Van 2007, p. 189). This occurred when mass incarceration gave undue improvement to one group as opposed to another. Today, both in the United States and the United Kingdom, it is evident that people of colour or lower classes are disproportionally overrepresented within the prison-industrial complex. While the mass prison complex created privilege to higher classes, it created a situation whereby the victims were stigmatized, criminalized, and did not enjoy the privileges of democracy and inclusion. The economic and social drivers of mass incarcera tion are explained by Downes (2006), who confirms that there is an inverse kinship between a states spending on upbeat and imprisonment rates.Mass incarceration also hindered democracy by preventing means through which people could share ideas or communication (Young 2000, p. 208). An incarcerated person undergo political disempowerment and a lack of influence, power, while he became extremely qualified on the prison complex (Travis 2002, p. 19). Despite several attempts of inclusion, provision for rehabilitation, training, and work opportunities, current social policies have not been successful in reinstating the match representation of lower classes, and the mass incarceration continues. (Reiman 2004, p. 5).ConclusionThe above refresh of publications and research studies, it is evident that the conflict theory accurately explains the emergence of mass incarceration during the reign of Thatcher in the United Kingdom, and Reagan in the United States. Historically, the uppe r berth class, that was more advantaged socially, economically and politically created laws and policies that increasingly criminalized the less powerful, creating a policy of segregation. Increased incarceration within the prison-industrial complex removed people who were not wanted. Apart from enhancing exclusion and stifling democracy, it helped the powerful class to maintain its influence, wealth and position within the society.BibliographyAkers, R.L., 1979. Theory and ideology in Marxist criminology. Criminology, 16(4), pp.527-Davis, A. (1998). clothed racialism Reflections on the prison industrial complex. Color Lines, 1(2), 11-13.Downes, D., 2001. The Macho punishable Economy Mass Incarceration in the United States-AEuropean Perspective. penalty & Society, 3(1), pp.61-80.Downes, D. (2006). Welfare and punishment The relationship between welfare spending and imprisonment.Hartnett, S. J. 2011. challenging the prison-industrial complex activism, arts, andeducational alterna tives. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.Newburn, T. 2002. Atlantic crossings Policy transfer and crime confine in the USA andBritain. Punishment & Society, 4(2), pp. 165-194.Panchamia, N., 2012. Competition in prisons. Institute for Government, http//www. Instituteforgovernment. org. uk/sites/ default option/files/publications/Prisons, 2.Reiman, J. H. 2004. The rich get richer and the poor get prison ideology, class, and criminal justice. Boston, Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Sparks, R. and McNeill, F., 2009. Incarceration, social control and human rights. THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY toil on SocialControl and Human RightsTravis, J. 2002. Invisible Punishment An Instrument of Social exclusion (From InvisiblePunishment The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment, P 15-36, 2002, Marc Mauer and Meda Chesney-Lind, eds.).Van der Linden, H. 2007. Democracy, racism and prisons. Charlottesville, Va, PhilosophyDocumentation Center.Wacquant, L., 2010. Class, race & hyperincarceration in revanchistAmerica. Daedalus, 139(3), pp.74-90.Wacquant, L., 2001. Deadly symbiosis When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & Society, 3(1), pp.95-133.Wehr, K. 2015. Beyond the prison industrial complex crime and incarceration in the 21stcentury. Place of publication not identified, Routledge.Young, I. M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.